What
About Paul Little?
The Pasadena Star News printed a
letter to the editor from District 2 incumbent Paul Little on Friday, February 16, 2007,
that included some misleading and false accusations about me.
On Sunday, February 18, they printed some of my response on the
front page.
Read the
Star News Story.
Paul
Little, is not supporting me although we have been friends and have
been political allies in the past. Last October, Paul replaced me as
his appointee to the Community Development Committee while I was
prominently opposing the scheme, which he backed, to
allow the NFL to replace the historic Rose Bowl and shut Pasadena
residents out of the Arroyo for 50 weekend days a year.
The path of our friendship had
earlier came to a fork, when Paul began to favor developers and
other wealthy interests over the residents who elected him. I
wouldn’t follow him down that route and we have been adversaries on
a number of issues in addition to development such as the demolition
of historic properties and vacating Madia Street. I did not seek
Paul’s support in this election. For one thing, Paul shares
responsibility for the city’s failure to control growth and for
dropping the ball on historical preservation issues - significant
problems that I am running to fix. Many District 2 voters are so
turned off by the type of politician that Paul has become that I
think that his endorsement would be a liability.
It was not part of my campaign
strategy to publicize Paul's failures. Paul's attack on me in his
letter to the editor left me no choice.
Why is
Paul Little saying those mean things about me?
The Pasadena Star News printed a
letter to the editor from District 2 incumbent Paul Little on Friday, February 16, 2007,
that said: "Someone is misleading potential voters in District 2 by
implying or stating that Paul Little is supporting the candidacy of James
Lomako." Paul's letter then went on to make a number of misleading and false accusations about me.
On Sunday, February 18, they printed
some of my response on the
front page.
Paul says that two constituents told Paul
that someone working for my campaign "left the impression" that Paul was in
some way helping me. I have been running against Paul's record and have
opposed him very publicly on some important issues like Measure A. Paul did
appoint me to official positions and we have been friends since 1995. I have
occasionally mentioned that. Many people are well aware of our long standing
political and personal relationship. I have talked with my volunteers and
have not been able to confirm that of them made any statements to voters
that could be interpreted as saying that Paul endorses me.
If Paul was really concerned about the
possibility that one or two of my volunteers "left the impression" that Paul
was supporting me, why hasn’t he disclosed more information? Paul doesn’t
need to reveal the identity of his anonymous tipster but he could have
contacted me personally and given me enough information so that I could have
followed up on his charges. Was the volunteer a man or woman? When did this
happen? What street did this occur on?
It looks like Paul's accusation about the
alleged volunteer miscommunication is a really a pretext to launch an attack
on me. One needn't look far for the motive. My campaign as well as a number
of my past public actions have put me at odds with Paul. Some of those
issues cast a negative shadow over his public record.
Paul says that he replaced me on the
Community Development Committee (CDC) when my behavior "became intolerable."
My second term on the CDC expired in July 2004 and I was not eligible to be
re-appointed because there is a two term limit. Paul let me stay on after
the expiration of my term for more than two years - until October 2006 -
before he appointed someone to replace me. At the time that Paul replaced me
I was working hard to defeat Measure A, the initiative to have the NFL take
over the Rose Bowl, and publicly criticizing Paul for backing the
initiative.
Paul says that I sat on the Design
Commission "during the time when it approved so many of those downtown
developments that he's so strenuously objecting to now." The truth is that
while I was on the Design Commission we turned down projects such as Charlie
Munger's Montana project across from the Paseo and the city council
repeatedly overturned our decisions when they were appealed or called up to
the City Council. Paul even told me: "tell your friends on the Design
Commission that if you keep on denying projects, we'll keep on overturning
your decisions."
Paul says that the city council "at least
in part" restructured the Design Commission to remove the CDC seat in order
to get me off the Design Commission. It is flattering, but far fetched, to
believe that the city council went to the effort to restructure an advisory
body to get me off it. Paul and some other city council members were unhappy
with me because I opposed the over-development of Pasadena and took a
leading role in trying to save our architectural heritage on the Design
Commission just as I am doing in my election campaign.
Paul says that I led a divisive effort to
become chair of the CDC just when affordable housing issues were coming to
the forefront. I did lead a successful effort to change the direction of the
CDC and I did become chair. What Paul does not say is that my reason was to
bring greater transparency and fairness into the allocation of city housing
funds and end a tradition of rubber-stamping staff decisions. We succeeded,
and the days of the city giving out most of its housing money through back
room deals may be coming to an end. Paul also doesn't say that he supported
me behind the scenes. I am proud of what I accomplished on the CDC.
The final break came when Paul sold out the
residents of Linda Vista, and the rest of Pasadena to benefit a wealthy
property owner with insider connections to city hall. I came to the city
council meeting and spoke against giving ("vacating") the last 150 feet of
Madia Street to John Quinn. The giveaway was defeated at the city council by
one vote on October 23, 2006. On November 10, Quinn contributed $500.00 to
Paul's campaign fund to help Paul repay a campaign debt to himself.
Late on the night of October 23, Paul sent
me an email implying that he would not help me and some of my neighbors
challenge the demolition of a historic home in our landmark district because
I had publicly opposed him on the Madia street issue.
I had no intention to tarnish Paul's
reputation. After 12 years on the city council it was time for him to go. I
hope that Paul will get back his balance and perspective once he recovers
from the intoxication of power.
Return to Home Page
This website is paid
for by Friends of Jim Lomako, 1500 Whitefield Rd, Pasadena, CA 91104